Flashback to April 19

American History

1968

London Bridge is sold to US oil company (to be erected in Arizona).

Read more

The event that took place on April 18, 1968, where the iconic London Bridge was sold to a US oil company to be erected in Arizona, marked a significant moment in history. This unexpected and controversial transaction stirred both intrigue and outrage among people worldwide. In this article, we delve into the details of this event, exploring its historical context and examining the consequences it had on the future of the London Bridge.

London Bridge, which spanned the River Thames in central London, was a symbol of the city’s rich history and heritage. Built in the 19th century, the bridge had become increasingly overcrowded and structurally unsound, prompting discussions about its future. In 1962, the Common Council of the City of London began exploring options for a new bridge to replace the aging structure.

Enter Robert P. McCulloch, an American entrepreneur and oil tycoon. He purchased the London Bridge for $2.46 million, with the intention of relocating it to Lake Havasu City in Arizona. The decision to sell such an iconic British landmark to an American buyer sparked controversy and divided public opinion.

On 4/18/1968, the London Bridge was dismantled piece by piece and carefully transported to Arizona. The process involved numbering each brick, stone, and iron beam to ensure an accurate reconstruction on the other side of the world. It took three years to complete the relocation and rebuilding of the bridge in Lake Havasu City, where it still stands today.

The move to sell and transport the London Bridge to the United States was met with criticism from many British citizens. They saw it as a loss of their cultural heritage and a symbol of American industrial dominance. Some even viewed it as a disrespectful sale of a national treasure to the highest bidder.

However, there were also supporters of the decision who argued that the relocation would preserve the historic bridge and provide economic benefits. The move generated significant intrigue and drew tourists to Lake Havasu City, contributing to the development of the area as a tourist destination.

In its new location, the London Bridge became a focal point for the growing Lake Havasu City community. McCulloch invested in surrounding infrastructure and commercial development to enhance the area’s appeal. Today, the bridge serves as a popular tourist attraction, drawing visitors from both the United States and around the world.

The transformation of the London Bridge from a historic structure in London to a tourist attraction across the Atlantic has had a lasting impact on how we perceive and value cultural heritage. While the selling of such an iconic landmark may have caused initial controversy, it also opened up conversations about the preservation and global mobility of historical structures.

Despite the relocation, London did not lose its connection to the bridge entirely. To replace the original structure, a more modern London Bridge was built in 1973 and still stands today, connecting the City of London with Southwark. This new bridge ensured that the city’s historical connection was not entirely severed by the sale of the old London Bridge.

The 1968 sale of the London Bridge to a US oil company remains a significant event in history, capturing the attention of people worldwide. Whether viewed positively or negatively, it highlights the complex intersections of history, commerce, and cultural heritage. The decision to relocate the bridge ultimately transformed a British icon into a symbol of cooperation and tourism across borders.

We strive for accuracy. If you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us!


Contact Us

Wake Up to Today's Flashback

Subscribe now to receive captivating daily digests from Today's Flashback. Delve into a variety of intriguing past events, all conveniently delivered to your inbox. Perfect for history enthusiasts and the curious alike!

We care about your data. View our privacy policy.
" "